[see also: necessity, require, necessary]
By subtracting a constant if need be, we may assume ......
There is no need for the assumption that ......
However, with the recent advent of simulation based inference, the need for analytically tractable posteriors is no longer critical.
Hochberg pointed to the need for procedures that are more powerful than classical comparison methods.
Let us digress to locate the need for relative ergodicity in the above arguments.
[see also: require, necessitate, necessary]
However, (9) needs handling with greater care.
The others being obvious, only (iv) needs proof.
A drawback to Pólya trees, and perhaps the main reason why they have not seen much application within the Bayesian nonparametric literature, is that an arbitrary partition tree needs to be specified.
We need to make the smallest possible jump.
To recover Wiener's famous result that Brownian paths are continuous, one needs to use more sophisticated reasoning.
This will help us find what conditions on $A$ are needed for $T(A)$ to be analytic.
For $F=R$, no integration over $M$ is needed in (5).
The only property of $M$ needed is local compactness.
More specialized notions from Banach space theory will be introduced as needed.
[modal verb, in questions, negatives or with {\it only}; see also: have to]
We need only consider three cases. [Or: We only need to consider]
Only shifts with $k=1$ need be considered.
It turns out that nothing more need be done to obtain ......
In that case $Y$ need only be metrizable (rather than completely metrizable).
Then $F$ need not satisfy (2). [= $F$ does not necessarily satisfy (2).]
However, it need not be the case that $V> W$, as we shall see in the following example.
Go to the list of words starting with: a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
y
z