[see also: none]
If $n=1$, there is nothing to prove.
Even in the case $n=2$, the application of Theorem 6 gives essentially nothing better than the inequality ......
It turns out that nothing more need be done to obtain ......
However, (ii) is nothing but the statement that ...... [= only the statement that]
The identity $p(A)=0$ is nothing other than the Cayley-Hamilton theorem.
If nothing else, I hope to convince my readers that Segal's theorem deserves recognition as a profound contribution to Gaussian analysis.
Go to the list of words starting with: a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
y
z