[see also: reliance]
The holomorphic dependence of the integral on $l$ follows from (4).
For convenience we ignore the dependence of $f$ on $g$.
For simplicity, we suppress the explicit dependence on $x$ in the notation.
When there is no ambiguity we drop the dependence on $B$ and write just $Y_T$ for $Y_{T,B}$.
Strictly speaking, we should write something like $a(l,m,n)$ to reflect the dependence; we shall rely upon context instead.
We must now bring dependence on $d$ into the arguments of [9].
Go to the list of words starting with: a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
y
z