The proof is not direct, but relies on the results of [2].
We underline that the aforementioned results in [1] all rely on the conformality of the underlying construction.
This will provide us with a way of getting some information about $M$ without relying on general theory.
Strictly speaking, we should write something like $a(l,m,n)$ to reflect the dependence; we shall rely upon context instead.
Go to the list of words starting with: a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
y
z